Court of Claims· 3/6/1951
Tuller Constraction Co. v. United States
Citations
- 118 Ct. Cl. 509
- 1951 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 112
- 1951 WL 5364
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- contractor could not recover for government tardiness in providing drawings because “the evidence shows that there would have been substantially the same delay in the completion of the job, if the Government had been prompt”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Howell, Jones, Littleton, Madden, Whitaker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commerce International Company, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Claims· 1964-10-16· cited 121×
- Essex Electro Engineers, Inc.,appellant v. Richard J. Danzig, Secretary of the NavyFederal Circuit· 2000-08-18· cited 102×
- Commerce International Co. v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1964-10-16· cited 25×
- R.P. Wallace, Inc. v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2004-12-15· cited 15×
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.