Skip to main content
· 11/14/2016

Tuka v. United States

Citations

  • 137 S. Ct. 481
  • 196 L. Ed. 2d 386
  • 85 U.S.L.W. 3237
  • 2016 WL 5472850
  • 2016 U.S. LEXIS 6877

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding not pretextual a demotion based on the employer’s determination that its employee’s unique skill set would be superfluous to the company after an RIF
  • “[E]ven though the [reduction in force] was not entirely necessary from a business standpoint, ... [t]his evidence simply does not permit a finding that ... discrimination rather than business judgment motivated [it]....”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.