Skip to main content

Tuggle v. State

Citations

  • 825 S.E.2d 221

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • any error in the admission of evidence was harmless where testimony was cumulative of other evidence already admitted and where there was strong evidence of guilt
  • any error in the admission of evidence was harmless where testimony was cumulative of other evidence already admitted and where there was 12 strong evidence of guilt
  • any error in the admission of evidence was harmless where testimony was cumulative of other evidence already admitted and where there was strong evidence of guilt
  • “Generally speaking, trial courts have the discretion to impose sentence within the parameters prescribed by a statute and if the sentence is within the statutory limits, the appellate courts will not review it.”
  • “Although the legislature defines crimes and sets the ranges of sentences, trial courts generally have the discretion to impose sentence within the parameters prescribed by [] statute and if the sentence is within the statutory limits, the appellate courts will not review it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Melton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.