Skip to main content

Tuer v. McDonald

Citations

  • 701 A.2d 1101
  • 347 Md. 507
  • 1997 Md. LEXIS 554

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that remedial measures evidence was not admissible to impeach testimony that, at the time of the event, the measure was not believed to be as practical as the one employed
  • holding that remedial measures evidence was not admissible to impeach testimony that, at the time of the event, the measure was not believed to be as practical as the one employed
  • circuit court’s exclusion of evidence based on lack of relevancy reviewed for abuse of discretion
  • “The prevailing, and pragmatically necessary, view is that the impeachment exception cannot be read in so expansive a manner.”
  • “The prevailing, and pragmatically necessary, view is that the impeachment exception cannot be read in so expansive a manner.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bell, Eldridge, Rodowsky, Chasanow, Raker, Wilner, Karwacki

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Tuer v. McDonald

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.