Tuepker v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming the district court’s conclusion on a 12(b)(6) motion that a water damage exclusion in the plaintiff’s policy excluded coverage for losses attributable to a storm
• high/low agreement based on the outcome of appeals

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).