Tudor v. Security Trust Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a claim that “plaintiff paid a premium for a product based on defendants’ inaccurate representations” could go forward
• price premium based on marketing that promised lozenges were “clinically proven” to reduce cold symptoms
• “To state a prima facie claim under either Section [349 or 350], a plaintiff must allege that the defendant (1) engaged in consumer-oriented conduct; (2) that the conduct was materially misleading; and (3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).