Tucson Unified School District v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that political subdivisions of the state are exempt from statutes of limitations, regardless of the nature of claim brought
• holding that political subdivisions of the state are exempt from statutes of limitations, regardless of the nature of claim brought
• holding A.R.S. § 12-510 is intended “to protect the public from the negligence of public officers that might deprive the public of its rights to redress against wrongdoers”
• Concluding the term “state” in A.R.S. § 12- 510 includes school districts, which “are sufficiently analogous to cities and counties so as to fall within the rationale of City of Bisbee.”
• “The nature of the plaintiff, not of the litigation” is dispositive in determining the applicability of nullum tempus.
• exempting school district from limitations period

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).