Skip to main content
· 6/6/1967

Tucson Gas & Electric Company v. Schantz

Citations

  • 428 P.2d 686
  • 5 Ariz. App. 511
  • 1967 Ariz. App. LEXIS 474

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “the testimony or opinions of individual members of the legislative body are not admissible” for discerning legislative intent
  • “[T]he testimony or opinions of individual members of the legislative body are not admissible.”
  • ‘[T]he testimony or opinions of individual members of the legislative body are not admissible.’
  • “Generally speaking, the right of a stockholder extends to all books, papers, contracts, minutes or other instruments from which he can derive any information that will enable him to protect his interest.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Krucker, Hathaway, Fenton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.