Tucson Estates, Inc. v. Superior Court

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the petitioner “is not a proper party to challenge the validity of the notice [of lis pendens] as to lots within Tucson Estates II which it has previously conveyed”
• plaintiffs sued to enforce rights incident to title to golf course and recorded lis pendens on property
• “The determination of whether [the] requirements [of a lis pendens] have been met . . . requires the exercise of the court’s discretion.”
• action affects title when it involves any “adjudication of rights incident to title to real property”
• Arizona lis pen-dens statute was taken from Californias lis pendens statute
• interpreting Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 12-1191 (1982)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).