Tucson Community Development & Design Center, Inc. v. City of Tucson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• plaintiff denied standing to challenge city’s redevelopment plan because they neither lived nor held property in the area affected by the plan
• taxpayer's petition for declaratory judgment with respect to acts of city and its mayor and council, which declared area of city blighted and established a redevelopment plan
• no taxpayer standing to challenge city use of block grant funds just because “regular city employees have performed services in furtherance of the project”
• “Since there has been no expenditure of funds raised by taxation and no pecuniary loss to the city, the mere status of resident taxpayer is insufficient to confer standing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).