Skip to main content
· 2/16/1990

Tucking v. BOARD OF JEFFERSON COUNTY COMM'RS.

Citations

  • 796 P.2d 1055
  • 14 Kan. App. 2d 442
  • 1990 Kan. App. LEXIS 106

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting argument that required elements need not be stated in written notice
  • plaintiff’s failure to comply with K.S.A. § 12-105b leaves court without subject matter jurisdiction
  • two categories of information neglected; three others only partially satisfied

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brazil, Rees, Gariglietti

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.