Tucker v. State Department of Transportation & Development

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding contractor's noncompliance with contract conditions and notice provisions were inexcusable
• stating that a tort claim under this theory could proceed if the plaintiff alleged sufficient facts to show bad faith by officials, which would effectively render them third parties to the contract they were charged with procuring for the town in their official capacities
• acknowledging in dicta that \there can be no intentional interference with contractual relations by someone who is directly or indirectly a party to the contract\
• acknowledging in dicta that \there can be no intentional interference with contractual relations by someone who is directly or indirectly a party to the contract\
• dismissing claim of tortious interference against town officials by a company that contracted with the town because, as the town's agents, they could not be held liable absent allegations of willful misconduct or lack of good faith
• dismissing claim of tortious interference against town officials by a company that contracted with the town because, as the town’s agents, they could not be held liable absent allegations of willful misconduct or lack of good faith

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).