Tucker v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that there was no reversible error where a shotgun was displayed in the courtroom because there was other evidence relating to the shotgun and “the prosecutor did not in any way call the weapon to the jury’s attention or suggest anything about it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Adams
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-06-27· cited 82×
• State v. Race
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1986-03-21· cited 67×
• State v. Marks
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1990-03-01· cited 22×
• State v. Thorson
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1978-03-02· cited 22×
• State v. Robledo-Kinney
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2000-07-13· cited 19×
• State v. Roden
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1986-03-14· cited 3×
• State v. Montgomery
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2005-12-27· cited 3×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Matousek
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1970-06-19· cited 36×
• State v. Smith
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1962-12-21· cited 25×
• State v. Swyningan
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1975-05-02· cited 18×
• State v. Jensen
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1971-03-12· cited 16×
• State v. Kline
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1963-08-30· cited 16×
• State v. Rosenberg
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1923-02-23· cited 15×
• State v. Hopfe
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1957-05-03· cited 14×
• State v. Guevara
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1965-03-05· cited 7×