Tucker v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that when a sentence is illegal, the State has the option of approving a corrected sentence or “going back to ‘square one’ in the plea bargain process”
• holding that Tucker could not stipulate as part of a negotiated plea agreement to being sentenced as a habitual offender when the underlying substantive offenses necessary for such sentencing did not exist
• holding that when an illegal sentence is the result of a negotiated plea agreement with the State, the State has the option of agreeing to the resentencing or withdrawing from the plea agreement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. White
  Illinois Supreme Court· 2011-06-16· cited 92×
• Raines v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-02-27· cited 5×
• Smith v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-08-09· cited 3×
• Rivers v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-09-30· cited 1×
• Jordan v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-02-10· cited 1×
• Ridley v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-09-23· cited 1×
• ALONSO KAOSAYAN HERNANDEZ v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-11-09· cited 1×
• State v. Luxenburg
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-06-05

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Nedd v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-09-10· cited 23×
• Jackson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-08-17· cited 18×
• Forshee v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-05-17· cited 15×
• Lee v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-04-07· cited 13×
• Howell v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-07-19· cited 6×
• Ford v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-03-13· cited 4×