Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 11/30/2001
Tucker v. State
Citations
- 833 So. 2d 668
- 2001 WL 1520625
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \`[J]urisdictional issues [are not] subject to a harmless error analysis.'\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 28,372×
- Ex Parte HarperSupreme Court of Alabama· 1991-09-27· cited 57×
- Ex Parte ParkerSupreme Court of Alabama· 1999-02-26· cited 39×
- Qualls v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1989-09-29· cited 28×
- Soles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2001-09-28· cited 24×
- Ex Parte HargettCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1999-07-02· cited 22×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.