Skip to main content
· 6/14/1954

Tucker v. Rucker

Citations

  • 221 Miss. 580
  • 67 Adv. S. 130
  • 73 So. 2d 269
  • 1954 Miss. LEXIS 566

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • party seeking new trial on ground of erroneous admission of evidence must have timely objected at trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ball, Ethridge, Holmes, Lee, Oberds

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.