Skip to main content

Tucker v. R.M. Tours

Citations

  • 977 A.2d 1170
  • 602 Pa. 147
  • 2009 Pa. LEXIS 1783

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that appellants engaged in misconduct by filing Rule 1925(b) statement that intended to overwhelm courts; explaining that Rule 1925(b
  • finding waiver where the appellants attempted to overwhelm the court by filing a 16-page Rule 1925(b) statement with 76 paragraphs and exhibits
  • finding waiver where 1925(b) statement of errors was 16 pages long and contained 76 paragraphs plus exhibits
  • finding waiver where 1925(b) statement of errors was 16 pages long and contained 76 paragraphs plus exhibits
  • finding waiver of all issues where “voluminous” Rule 1925(b) Statement raising 76 issues made it impossible for the trial court to provide comprehensive analysis
  • finding waiver where 1925(b) statement of errors was 16 pages long and contained 76 paragraphs plus 5 At oral argument, Hospital’s counsel indicated that the 1925(b

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Castille, Saylor, Eakin, Baer, Todd, McCaffery, Greenspan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.