Skip to main content
· 10/2/1997

Tucker v. Rand

Citations

  • 347 N.C. 274
  • 493 S.E.2d 759

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding inaccurate shop drawings produced by contractor and approved by government were not contract indications where contractor was responsible for verifying dimensions shown on drawings
  • “Where the provisions of a contract are unambiguous, an inconsistent trade practice cannot prevail.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.