· 5/7/1999
Tucker v. Ohtsu Tire & Rubber Co., Ltd.
Citations
- 49 F. Supp. 2d 456
- 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13511
- 1999 WL 306864
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- permitting supplementation of expert’s disclosure despite party’s claim of added time and expense
- “[A] party who delays supplementing Rule 26(a)(2)(B
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Grimm
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.