Skip to main content
· 9/19/2003

Tucker v. Community Medical Center

Citations

  • 833 A.2d 217
  • 2003 Pa. Super. 356
  • 2003 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3180

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “[t]he decision to grant or deny a challenge for cause for a juror in a close relationship with either of the parties in a case is a question of law and is subject to ordinary review.”
  • expert’s opinion that catheter could not perforate urethral wall was based upon his urological experience and not subject to Frye
  • expert’s opinion that catheter could not perforate urethral wall was based upon his urological experience and not subject to Frye

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Musmanno, Bowes, Popovich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.