Skip to main content
· 2/16/1898

Tucker v. Charleston & Western Railway Co.

Citations

  • 51 S.C. 306
  • 28 S.E. 943
  • 1898 S.C. LEXIS 8

Syllabus

<p>1. Charge — Appliances and Machinery — Employer a'nd Employee — Railroads.—Charge as to appliances furnished employees by employers not objectionable in connection with the allegations of the complaint.</p> <p>2. Exception that does not state the proposition of law to be reviewed is fatally defective.</p> <p>3. Charge. — Judge not compelled to charge a request in the language proposed.</p> <p>4. Ibid. — Practice.—Proper practice in refusing a request indicated.</p> <p>5. Ibid. — Appear.—If a Judge in refusing a request commit technical error, which does not mislead the jury, it is not reversible error.</p> <p>6. Exceptions too general for consideration.</p>

Judges: Gary

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.