M.D. Florida· 5/5/2010
Tucker v. CBE Group, Inc.
Citations
- 710 F. Supp. 2d 1301
- 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54892
- 2010 WL 1849034
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that despite 57 calls over a 20–day period being “somewhat high,” the conduct still did not violate § 1692(d)(5
- noting that despite 57 calls over a 20-day period being “somewhat high,” the conduct still did not violate § 1692(d)(5
- finding that plaintiff and his counsel unreasonably and vexatiously multiplied proceedings with deliberate indifference after it became clear in discovery that plaintiff’s claims had no factual basis
- finding that the creditor did not violate the FDCPA as a matter of law even though there was evidence that the debtor received up to seven calls in a single day
- noting in caller's favor that caller \did not call back the same day after leaving a message\
- finding average of three calls per day “somewhat high” but insufficient to find violation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Adams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Carman v. CBE Group, Inc.D. Kansas· 2011-03-23· cited 26×
- Lardner v. Diversified Consultants Inc.S.D. Florida· 2014-05-01· cited 14×
- Durthaler v. Accounts Receivable Management, Inc.S.D. Ohio· 2012-04-09· cited 14×
- Hoover v. Monarch Recovery Management, Inc.E.D. Pennsylvania· 2012-08-24· cited 10×
- Hicks v. America's Recovery Solutions, LLCN.D. Ohio· 2011-09-29· cited 9×
- James Kuntz v. Rodenburg LLPEighth Circuit· 2016-09-22· cited 8×
- Brown v. Credit Management, LPN.D. Georgia· 2015-09-15· cited 2×
- Dunning v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLCS.D. Florida· 2012-11-09· cited 2×
- Christopher Brown and Carrie Brown v. Enterprise Recovery Systems, Inc.Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2013-08-22
- Valentine & Kebartas, Inc. v. Gary J. LenahanWest Virginia Supreme Court· 2017-06-12
- Harrington v. Roundpoint Mortg. Servicing Corp.M.D. Florida· 2017-11-30
- Wenzel, et al. v. National Creditors Connection, Inc., et al.D. New Hampshire· 2018-04-20
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
- Avirgan v. HullEleventh Circuit· 1991-06-18· cited 332×
- Diane Jeter v. Credit Bureau, Inc.Eleventh Circuit· 1985-05-20· cited 266×
- William Riccard v. Prudential Insurance CompanyEleventh Circuit· 2002-09-24· cited 232×
- Attwood v. SingletaryEleventh Circuit· 1997-02-11· cited 197×
- Kort v. Diversified Collection Services, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 2005-01-10· cited 133×
- Akalwadi v. Risk Management Alternatives, Inc.D. Maryland· 2004-09-22· cited 68×
- Kuhn v. Account Control Technology, Inc.D. Nevada· 1994-10-18· cited 62×
- Eugene C. Anderson v. Smithfield FoodsEleventh Circuit· 2003-12-17· cited 53×
- Johnson v. NCB Collection ServicesD. Connecticut· 1992-08-21· cited 34×
- Joseph v. JJ Mac Intyre Companies, LLCN.D. California· 2002-12-12· cited 31×
- Brown v. Card Service CenterThird Circuit· 2006-09-29· cited 9×
- Scottsdale Insurance v. Cutz, LLCS.D. Florida· 2007-03-09· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.