Skip to main content
· 1/15/1861

Tucker v. Bond

Citations

  • 23 Ark. 268

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • suggesting that the jurisdictional analysis in Smith is suspect in light of the change in this court’s test for jurisdiction established by Fisher
  • dismissing plaintiffs claims for costs and fees for the instant suit as unripe
  • “[T]he court cannot consider its inherent powers alone to be sufficient to overcome the sovereign immunity protecting the United States from claims for monetary contempt sanctions or litigation expenses.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: English

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.