· 1/15/1861
Tucker v. Bond
Citations
- 23 Ark. 268
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- suggesting that the jurisdictional analysis in Smith is suspect in light of the change in this court’s test for jurisdiction established by Fisher
- dismissing plaintiffs claims for costs and fees for the instant suit as unripe
- “[T]he court cannot consider its inherent powers alone to be sufficient to overcome the sovereign immunity protecting the United States from claims for monetary contempt sanctions or litigation expenses.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: English
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.