Skip to main content
· 3/13/1992

Tucker Station, Ltd. v. Chalet I, Inc.

Citations

  • 417 S.E.2d 40
  • 203 Ga. App. 383
  • 65 Fulton County D. Rep. 18
  • 1992 Ga. App. LEXIS 427

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming trial court’s grant of motion because even though notice was sent, it was not received
  • affirming trial court’s grant of motion because even though notice was sent, it was not received
  • trial court could correct obvious error and interpret contract accordingly

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pope, Birdsong, Cooper

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.