· 3/13/1992
Tucker Station, Ltd. v. Chalet I, Inc.
Citations
- 417 S.E.2d 40
- 203 Ga. App. 383
- 65 Fulton County D. Rep. 18
- 1992 Ga. App. LEXIS 427
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming trial court’s grant of motion because even though notice was sent, it was not received
- affirming trial court’s grant of motion because even though notice was sent, it was not received
- trial court could correct obvious error and interpret contract accordingly
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pope, Birdsong, Cooper
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.