Tucker Aluminum Products, Inc. v. Grossman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that insurer has a duty to defend state law claims outside coverage of policy even though the federal claims falling within the policy were based on separate facts
• “[T]he question of coverage should not hinge exclusively on the draftsmanship skills or whims of the plaintiff in the underlying action.”
• duty to defend is broader than duty to indemnify because the claims do not necessarily need to result in indemnification in order to trigger the duty to defend

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).