Tuck v. Marriott Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, while the trial court should have ruled on the plaintiff’s motion to compel before granting the defendant’s summary judgment motion, “where, as here, the disallowed discovery would add nothing of substance to the party’s claim, reversal is not required[ ]”
• “Although the grant of summary judgment while a motion to compel discovery is pending is generally not condoned, where, as here, the disallowed discovery would add nothing of substance to the party’s claim, reversal is not required.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).