Tuck v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Commission did not err in finding no proof of “mutual mistake” where the claimant represented to the Commission that “all issues were resolved” by the award agreement
• holding that the Commission did not err in finding no proof of “mutual mistake” where the claimant represented to the Commission that “all issues were resolved” by the award agreement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).