Tuck-It-Away Associates, L.P. v. Empire State Development Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming dismissal of the complaint against the tenant-store because the plaintiff failed to prove that the tenant had possession or control of the parking lot where the plaintiff fell
• Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Herkimer County, Auser, J. — Summary Judgment.
• “[P]laintiffs were required to come forward with sufficient proof in evidentiary form to demonstrate that Caldor had, or was chargeable with, control of the parking lot where plaintiff fell, or that Caldor actually created the hazard.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).