Tucci v. State of Florida

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying Franlcs where the affiant was present during the non-affiant investigator’s telephone interviews.and based same-day affidavit on those interviews
• warrant cannot be based on untrained or inexperienced person's claim to have smelled growing plants that have no commonly recognized odor
• “[A] warrant cannot be based on the claim of an untrained or inexperienced person to have smelled growing plants which have no commonly recognized odor.”
• warrant cannot be based on untrained or inexperienced person's claim to have smelled growing plants that have no commonly recognized odor
• “Where . . . a warrant’s 15 validity is challenged for deliberate or reckless omissions of facts that tend to mislead, the 16 affidavit must be considered with the omitted information included.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).