Skip to main content
· 7/3/2002

Tucci v. Smoothie King Franchises, Inc.

Citations

  • 215 F. Supp. 2d 1295
  • 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15147
  • 2002 WL 1888689

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • dismissing claim for civil conspiracy where plaintiff did not allege sufficient facts to infer a conspiratorial agreement between defendants
  • dismissing the plaintiff’s IIED claim that “because the notarized agreement was forged and Defendant knew that the agreement was forged, it intentionally and recklessly inflicted mental suffering”
  • “There are no facts to support an inference that there was an agreement between [the defendants].”
  • quotin Boczar v. Manatee Hosp. & Health Sys., Inc., 731 F. Supp. 1042, 1046 (M.D. Fle 1990)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kovachevich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.