Tubbs v. United Central Bank, N.A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a bank’s knowledge of a customer’s “illiquid” position for over a year “does not necessarily mean that [the bank] knew that fraud or other tortious acts were being committed”
• recognizing equitable lien on non-homestead farmland based on representations made by property owners
• noting that a conspiracy is a “combination of two or more persons to accomplish, through concerted actions, an unlawful end or a lawful end by unlawful means”
• equitable lien a restitution concept “applied by courts of equity to avoid injustice and particularly to avoid unjust enrichment”
• “The first inquiry is whether the principals ... committed tortious acts ... ”
• apparently applying the test for purposes of analysis only

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).