Tubbs v. City of Greensboro

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that claim filed pursuant to P.A. 93-77 subject only to six year statute of limitations
• holding that if § 3 of PA 93-77 applies, then Connecticut's six-year limitation period governs the underinsured action and not § 2(e) of PA 93-77, codified as General Statutes § 38a-336 (g)
• employing without comment contract statute of limitations, rather than statute of limitations applicable to tort actions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).