· 1/18/1991
Tryon v. City of Lowell
Citations
- 565 N.E.2d 456
- 29 Mass. App. Ct. 720
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that, once a fence was erected by a municipality, the city had a duty to maintain it, and its failure to do so “does not entail a discretionary function”
- city’s decision to erect fence between school and abutting railroad tracks was discretionary act, but city’s inadequate maintenance of such fence did not entail discretionary function warranting immunity under § 10 [6]
- “whether or not in a particular situation a decision to erect a fence is discretionary, the maintenance of or failure to maintain a fence after its erection does not entail a discretionary function”
- “[M]aintenance ... or failure to maintain . . . does not entail a discretionary function . . . [and] day to day care and maintenance . . . seems at the opposite end from policy and planning . . .” (internal quotations and citations omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kass, Kaplan, Ireland
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.