Trustees of the National Elevator Industry Pension v. Lutyk

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• mentioning that “the relevant time period is the time at which the corporation incurred liability” in a corporate veil case
• \The use of corporate funds for personal benefits - [ ] particularly at a time of financial distress - also supports piercing the corporate veil.\
• “Although courts often do not hold closely-held corporations to strict standards with respect to corporate formalities, disregard of corporate formalities remains a factor of some significance even where the corporation is closely held.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).