Skip to main content
· 4/7/2000

Federal Case

Citations

  • 209 F.3d 587
  • 28 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1305
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 6276

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding “even more substantial deficiencies in the district court’s analysis” of the fourth factor of the estoppel claim because it “found ‘little doubt’ that the” factor was satisfied only by the absence of actual knowledge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.