· 4/7/2000
Federal Case
Citations
- 209 F.3d 587
- 28 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1305
- 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 6276
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding “even more substantial deficiencies in the district court’s analysis” of the fourth factor of the estoppel claim because it “found ‘little doubt’ that the” factor was satisfied only by the absence of actual knowledge
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.