Trustees of Purdue University v. Hagerman Construction Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiff's complaint alleged claims related to land because there was a sufficient nexus between the plaintiff's action and the land on which the construction project occurred
• holding that the plaintiff's complaint alleged claims related to land because there was a sufficient nexus between the plaintiff's action and the land on which the construction project occurred
• reversing a trial court’s grant of a motion for change of venue based upon a “review of the complaint”
• “[A]lthough Purdue’s claims involve Hagerman’s asserted breach of contract, this legal theory is based on the alleged poor quality of Hagerman’s work [in constructing a building on campus] insofar as such work affected land in Tippecanoe County.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).