Trustees of Columbia University v. Columbia/HCA Healthcare Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the seventh factor was neutral where no evidence of the defendant’s product’s quality was presented
• holding that the seventh factor was neutral where no evidence of Defendant’s product’s quality was presented
• holding that the seventh factor was neutral where no evidence of the defendant’s product’s quality was presented
• holding that the seventh factor was neutral where no evidence of Defendant’s product’s quality was presented
• finding that “any acquired distinctiveness” of Columbia University’s mark for the name Columbia “in connection with medical or healthcare services has been seriously undermined by third party use of the same or similar marks”
• fame of mark \Columbia\ for healthcare services \has been seriously undermined by third party use of the same or similar marks\ both within the health care industry and in other industries

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).