Trunick v. Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where the employer was ordered to resume payment of benefits because it repeatedly told the claimant that no light-duty jobs were available, and offered the claimant a light-duty job of “doubtful duration” only after he enrolled in school and paid his tuition

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).