Trundy v. Farrar

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, when asked, “a court will take judicial notice of another court’s records if a party provides proof of the records”
• holding that the courts of appeals do not have authority to consider merits of a void order
• holding appellate court may take judicial notice of relevant facts under rule of evidence 201(b)
• stating that “appellate courts do not have jurisdiction to address the merits of appeals from void orders or judgments”
• providing that appellate courts have no jurisdiction to address the merits of appeals from judgments that are void
• stating that “appellate courts do not have jurisdiction to address the merits of appeals from void orders or judgments”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).