Trump. v. International Refugee Assistance Project

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding a ten-month interval “between the protected activity and adverse action too long to suggest a causal nexus”
• explaining that in race discrimination suits under Title VII, the question a court “seek[s] to answer is whether a reasonable juror could conclude that [the plaintiff] would have kept her job if she had a different ethnicity, and everything else had remained the same”
• applying the three-part framework to claims of employment discrimination and retaliation under federal law
• “Unmistakable evidence of racial animus—racial epithets or explicitly race-motivated treatment— makes for simple analysis.”
• \Unmistakable evidence of [discrimination] . . . makes for simple analysis.\
• Title VII discrimination and retaliation claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).