Trump Taj Mahal Associates v. Alibraham (In Re Trump Taj Mahal Associates)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[A]lthough many people in [claimant’s] position threaten to file suit against the Taj, only a nominal number, if any, actually bring suit.”
• “If a party were permitted to defeat the presumption of receipt of notice resulting from the certificate of mailing by a simple affidavit to the contrary, the scheme of deadlines and bar dates under the Bankruptcy Code would come unraveled.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).