Trumbull v. Jefferson County
Citations
- 60 Wash. 479
- 111 P. 569
- 1910 Wash. LEXIS 1075
Syllabus
<p>Appeal — Dismissal—Cessation of Controversy — Record — Conclusiveness — Affidavits. A cessation of tbe controversy, by reason of a transfer of tbe interests of one of tbe parties prior to the trial or to the making up of the issues, cannot be shown in the supreme court by affidavits contradicting the record made by the- judgment and statement of facts, no mention of such transfer having been made in the pleadings or proceedings and no notice having been taken thereof until after appeal taken.</p> <p>Lis Pendens — Rule of — Effect—Appeal—Benefit of. After the filing of a Us pendens, a grantee of the real estate, the subject-matter of the suit, is entitled to the benefit of an appeal taken by his grantor, the rule of Us pendens being that the action may proceed without any notice being taken of the grantee pendente lite.</p>
Judges: Crow
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Dakota County v. GliddenSupreme Court· 1885-01-26· cited 114×
- Stout v. Philippi Manufacturing & Mercantile Co.West Virginia Supreme Court· 1895-11-29· cited 53×
- Norris v. IleIllinois Supreme Court· 1894-05-05· cited 48×
- Moss v. ShearCalifornia Supreme Court· 1866-10-15· cited 26×
- Sykes v. BeckNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1903-07-03· cited 21×
- Poley v. LacertOregon Supreme Court· 1899-07-31· cited 14×
- Box v. KelsoWashington Supreme Court· 1892-12-13· cited 11×
- Smith v. HarringtonWyoming Supreme Court· 1891-10-13· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.