Skip to main content
· 2/6/1991

Trumbull v. Health Care & Retirement Corp. of America

Citations

  • 756 F. Supp. 532
  • 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1666
  • 55 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,588
  • 58 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 750
  • 1991 WL 16677

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating “in order for two employees to be similarly situated in such a way that their disparate treatment creates a reasonable inference of discrimination, the circumstances of their employment must be ‘nearly identical’”
  • prima facie case under FCRA can be established in same way as under ADEA
  • comments must be blatant regarding person’s age to constitute direct evidence under Young

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kovachevich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.