· 5/4/1999
Truly, Smith, Latham & Kuehnle v. International Paper Co.
Citations
- 47 F. Supp. 2d 794
- 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6493
- 1999 WL 285089
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[W]ith the exception of notice issues, federal courts have no jurisdiction to hear claims that a.completed administrative forfeiture violated the property owner’s constitutional rights.”
- “Similarly, it is clear that a federal court can only assert in rem jurisdiction over drug proceeds if the state courts have not already exercised in rem or quasi in rem jurisdiction over the money.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Barbour
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.