Skip to main content
· 5/4/1999

Truly, Smith, Latham & Kuehnle v. International Paper Co.

Citations

  • 47 F. Supp. 2d 794
  • 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6493
  • 1999 WL 285089

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[W]ith the exception of notice issues, federal courts have no jurisdiction to hear claims that a.completed administrative forfeiture violated the property owner’s constitutional rights.”
  • “Similarly, it is clear that a federal court can only assert in rem jurisdiction over drug proceeds if the state courts have not already exercised in rem or quasi in rem jurisdiction over the money.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barbour

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.