Truger v. Department of Human Rights

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• referring to “an employer’s duty to accommodate” a disability, without deciding whether duty is statutorily imposed
• referring to “an employer’s duty to accommodate” a disability, without deciding whether duty is statutorily imposed
• reciting framework, concluding that second and third prima facie requirements were not met and then separately addressing several additional issues, including reasonable-accommodation argument, without explaining its import to prima facie case or the framework in general
• noting duty to accommodate disability, but holding that the plaintiff’s claim failed because she offered no evidence that she asked for a reasonable accommodation or that any type of accommodation would enable her to perform her job
• noting duty to accommodate disability, but holding that the plaintiff’s claim failed because she offered no evidence that she asked for a reasonable accommodation or that any type of accommodation would enable her to perform her job
• “employee has the burden of asserting the duty and showing the accommodation was requested and necessary for adequate job performance”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).