Skip to main content
· 3/6/1964

Truesdale v. Friedman

Citations

  • 267 Minn. 402
  • 127 N.W.2d 277
  • 1964 Minn. LEXIS 653

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the party seeking review must provide a record that is sufficient to show “all matters necessary for consideration of the questions presented”
  • stating that the record must be “sufficient to show the alleged errors and all matters necessary for consideration of the questions presented”
  • allowing parties to shorten the printed record as much as possible without jeopardizing the arguments advanced on appeal
  • “[T]he party seeking review has the duty to see that the appellate court is presented with a record which is sufficient to show the alleged errors.”
  • party seeking appellate review has duty to see that appellate court is presented with a record which shows all alleged errors and matters necessary for review
  • “It is elementary that the party seeking review has the duty to see that the appellate court is presented with a record which is sufficient to show the alleged errors and all matters necessary for consideration of the questions presented.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.