· 3/6/1964
Truesdale v. Friedman
Citations
- 267 Minn. 402
- 127 N.W.2d 277
- 1964 Minn. LEXIS 653
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that the party seeking review must provide a record that is sufficient to show “all matters necessary for consideration of the questions presented”
- stating that the record must be “sufficient to show the alleged errors and all matters necessary for consideration of the questions presented”
- allowing parties to shorten the printed record as much as possible without jeopardizing the arguments advanced on appeal
- “[T]he party seeking review has the duty to see that the appellate court is presented with a record which is sufficient to show the alleged errors.”
- party seeking appellate review has duty to see that appellate court is presented with a record which shows all alleged errors and matters necessary for review
- “It is elementary that the party seeking review has the duty to see that the appellate court is presented with a record which is sufficient to show the alleged errors and all matters necessary for consideration of the questions presented.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.