True v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the plaintiffs allegations that the defendant’s advertisement induced the plaintiff to purchase the vehicle were sufficient at the pleading stage as the plaintiffs knowledge and state of mind are not subject to Rule 9(b)
• “Nothing in the EPCA or its accompanying regulations purports to regulate advertising of fuel economy beyond the requirements regarding these stickers and booklets.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).