True v. American Honda Motor Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that coupons aim to facilitate a sale to a purchaser who would not have otherwise purchased the product
• “[T]he lodestar method of awarding fees is permissible under CAFA . . . .”
• “[D]ifferential treatment 18 of class members may be appropriate where ‘the settlement terms are rationally based on 19 legitimate considerations.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).