Truckdrivers, Chauffeurs & Helpers, Local Union No. 100 v. National Labor Relations Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the discretionary function exception “bars all claims based on 27 discretionary acts regardless of whether the acts were performed negligently or represented an 28 abuse of discretion.”
• holding that course of military investigation \implicates policy considerations\
• “The course that a military investigation takes remains a choice of the officials in charge and implicates policy considerations, making it subject to the discretionary function exception.”
• “The course that a military investigation takes remains a choice of the officials in charge and implicates policy considerations, making it subject to the discretionary function exception.”
• the Supreme Court’s reasoning in Feres “appl[ies] equally to actions under [the SIAA]”
• the Supreme Court’s reasoning in Feres “appl[ies] equally to actions under [the SIAA]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).