· 4/9/1987
Truck Drivers Local 807, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America v. Carey Transportation Inc.
Citations
- 816 F.2d 82
- 125 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2093
- 16 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 799
- 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 4815
- 16 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 85
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- allowing a debtor to rely “on proof that managers and non-union employees are assuming increased responsibilities as a result of staff reductions without receiving commensurate salary increases”
- approving rejection of collective bargaining agreements based on proposals including changes in health and pension benefits, work rules, workers’ compensation and disability, and scheduling and assignment rules
- “[I]t becomes impossible to weigh necessity as to reorganization without looking into the debtor’s ultimate future and estimating what the debtor needs to attain financial health.”
- “[a] union’s presentation of a counter-offer that its members do not support does not satisfy the good cause requirement”
- “Because a section 1113 application will almost always be filed before an overall reorganization plan can be prepared, the debtor cannot be expected to identify future alterations in its debt structure.”
- “Because a section 1113 application will almost always be filed before an overall reorganization plan can be prepared, the debtor cannot be expected to identify future alterations in its debt structure.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Meskill, Kearse, Altimari
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.